Show More


Seminar Leaders

Click on the names below to learn more about our 2014 Seminar Leaders

jan.jpg

 

Dr. Jan BoxillDepartment of Philosophy, University of North Carolina - Chapel Hill


"The Moral Significance of Sport"

Friday, April 11th at 4:15 pm, Prindle Auditorium

Sports play a significant role in the lives of millions of people throughout the world, as participants, fans, spectators, and critics.  Even those who are uninvolved, bored or critical of sports are often affected by them.  Sports play a significant moral role in society by reflecting and affecting changes in our society. They provide the model for the changes, both positively and negatively.

Through their nature and design, sports provide participants as autonomous beings: vehicles for self-expression, self-respect and self-development. To provide individuals these vehicles, sports also serve as what John Rawls calls a “social union” in a society of social unions; that is, a community of shared ends and common activities valued for themselves, enjoying one another’s excellences and individuality as they participate in the activities, resulting in complementarity.  In providing a significant moral function for both the individual and for the society sports also serve as a public forum for ethics, and provide a unique model for understanding our own society.

 

 

Dr. Marc CohenAlbers School of Business, Seattle University


"Cooperation and Competition in Organizations and the Broader Social Order"

Saturday, April 12th at 10:00 am, Prindle Auditorium

The presentation will outline the central theoretical account of organizational (group) activity in the management and economics literatures—what is called the transaction cost theory of the firm, a theory that assumes persons are fundamentally self-interested and competitive. And the presentation will offer an alternative account of organizational activity as genuinely cooperative. The explanation of transaction cost theory will be grounded in results from experimental behavioral economics. The presentation will emphasize the role of trust in cooperative activity, and also briefly describe the implications for thinking about the broader social order (beyond the context of particular organizations).

 

 

Dr. William DoanCollege of Arts and Architecture, Penn State University


"Not Self Inflicted"

Friday, April 11th at 7:00 pm, Prindle Auditorium

What happens when you leave behind a blue-collar-working-class-Irish-Italian-Appalachian-Evangelical-Catholic life and cross into another class? What happens when you find yourself an outsider in two worlds and moving forward means never going back? What does it mean to discover that some things about your life were not self inflicted, even when you were made to believe they were? And despite all that, you still crave fried baloney sandwiches, hamburger stew, and a good game of trailer-trash tag with BB guns. Not Self Inflicted is a show about that and some other stuff. And I have a BB in my head to prove it.

 

Dr. Jeffery Smith

Dr. Jeffery SmithSchool of Business, University of Redlands, Visiting Schaenen Scholar, DePauw University


"Lance Armstrong and Institutional Legitimacy: The Ethics of Being a Cheater"

Thursday, April 10th at 7:00 pm, Prindle Auditorium

There are settled reasons why individuals should not cheat in sports, business or politics. But what are the ethics of being a cheater? What, in other words, do we expect of cheaters once they have been exposed as cheaters? This discussion begins to analyze the attitudes, behaviors and responses of cheaters and offers a set of comments designed to critically examine what we can reasonably expect of those who cheat in order to succeed. Although cheating is ultimately an individual choice, it is often endemic to institutional environments where competition is the dominant mechanism through which individuals define their identity and measure their accomplishments. We should therefore not only expect cheating to occur on a regular basis, but , because of this, it is uniquely important to examine how cheaters can respond to their cheating in a way that preserves the legitimacy of the institutions in which they compete. The case of professional cyclist Lance Armstrong will be featured in the exploration of this theme.