Button Menu

Prof. Kevin Howley Sees "Dire" Consequences if Net Neutrality Rules are Changed

Prof. Kevin Howley Sees "Dire" Consequences if Net Neutrality Rules are Changed

November 27, 2017

"The Federal Communications Commission’s proposed changes to net neutrality rules could signal the end of the open Internet," writes Kevin Howley, professor of communication (media studies) at DePauw University. "The results for consumers, small businesses and independent journalism couldn’t be more dire."

In a letter to the editor of USA Today, Dr. Howley notes, "Under Title II provisions, Internet service providers (ISP) are designated 'common carriers,' which are expressly prohibited from stopping or slowing Internet traffic and establishing 'fast lanes' that would prioritize download speeds for a fee -- a scheme that amounts to cyber-extortion. Should the FCC plan prevail, the entire ecosystem of the Internet would change."

According to the professor, "ISPs, which already enjoy monopoly status in cities and towns across this country, would be able to play favorites with all manner of Internet traffic, from streaming services to alternative news sites. While an open Internet provides a level playing field for any user, the elimination of net neutrality gives ISPs enormous power to pick winners and losers in cyberspace."

Howley concludes, "The lack of transparency surrounding this effort is emblematic of the sort of control ISPs would like to command. Rather than promote innovation and entrepreneurship in digital space, these proposed changes will stifle creativity and debate, culture and commerce."

Access the letter at the newspaper's website.

Professor Howley is the editor of Media Interventions and Understanding Community Media and authored Community Media: People, Places, and Communication Technologies.  He was quoted in this USA Today article and wrote a 2011 column on the potential ramifications of a "tiered internet."

Source: USA Today

Back