ARTICLES
James W. Bittner
Persuading Us to Rejoice and Teaching Us How to Praise: Le
Guin's Orsinian Tales
Abstract..-- In 1951, the year Ursula Kroeber began graduate work at
Columbia in French and Italian literature, she invented an imaginary central European
country and wrote her first Orsinian tale. The countrys name, Orsinia or the Ten
Provinces, has the same root as its creators name: orsino, Italian for
"bearish," is derived from "ursa," Latin for bear. In
LeGuins dry explanation, "its my country, so it bears my name." I
emphasize the early date of some of these stories to dispel any notion that Orsinian
Tales is LeGuins attempt to extend the range of her talents beyond the
boundaries of fantasy and science fiction. The opposite is the case. Orsinian Tales
includes chunks of the bedrock that lies beneath LeGuins other, later, imaginary
countries and worlds.
John M. Christensen
New Atlantis Revisited: Science and the Victorian Tale of the
Future
Abstract..-- By the mid-nineteenth century, the Baconian dream of
material progress seemed a reality; mans dominion over the natural world had been
enormously increased by achievements in the various sciences and the practical application
of their methods and discoveries. Salomons House had a secure foundation in the New
Atlantis of Victorian England, and as the province of empirical science was extended to
include all aspects of life, the optimism of the positivists grew boundless. Darwin
provided a central metaphor for his age, and virtually no mode of thought--social,
political, religious, aesthetic--was untouched by the context of evolution. This concept
(or rather the version of it popularized by social theoreticians such as G. H. Lewes and
Herbert Spencer), afforded many a rationale for faith in endless progress through
technological advance. It also generated a fictional vehicle for expressing anxieties
about an increasingly urban industrial world and about the implications of evolutionary
speculation itself. That vehicle was the quasi-utopian tale of the future.
Taken as a whole, the Victorian tale of the future is a pessimistic genre that reacts
against the prevailing cultural positivism. Considering such pessimistic texts of the era
as M. P. Sheils The Purple Cloud (1901), Fergus Humes The Year of
Miracle (1891), Kenneth Flingsbys Meda (1891), Edward
Bulwer-Lyttons The Coming Race (1871), W. H. Mallocks The New Paul
and Virginia (1878), H. G. Wellss The Island of Dr. Moreau (1896), J. S.
Fletchers The Three Days Terror (1901), Hume Nisbets The Great
Secret (1895), and W. Laird Clowes The Great Peril (1893), this essay
argues that most futuristic fantasies of this period appeal to the stock prejudices of the
public. Society seems too complex for the average individual to comprehend or influence;
it appears to be coming apart at the seams and somehow the "experts"--the
scientists and technicians--are at fault.
[A response by David Lake appears in SFS 18 (July
1979).]
Stephen H. Goldman
John Brunner's Dystopias: Heroic Man in Unheroic Society
Abstract..-- Two points may be gained from a reading of Brunners
Age of Miracles that carry implications for Brunners other work. Brunner does
not assume a future of promise and glory for mankind: the optimism of a manifest destiny
is not part of the world that Brunner creates. Instead, Brunner questions the future and
mans place in it. The second point is a consequence of the first. Since mankind has
no manifest destiny, how is man to determine his place in the future? In Age of
Miracles, the future of the human race is an open question, and the solution to that
question depends on individuals. Three other Brunner novels are likewise concerned with
this issue of heroic men in dystopian settings. Stand on Zanzibar, The Sheep
Look Up, and The Shockwave Rider all suggest that human beings themselves must
take responsibility for the human race.
Joanna Russ
SF and Technology as Mystification
Abstract..-- "Technology," as it finds its way into almost
all the discussions of it I have participated in lately, is the sexy rock star of the
humanities, and like the rock star is an obfuscation of something else. Talk about
technology is also an addiction, as may be seen in the reception of such popular
film and television series as Star Wars and Star Trek. (Star Wars
generates only one desire--the desire for a sequel.) In popular and academic discourses
alike, hiding behind that sexy rock-star, technology, is a much more sinister and powerful
figure: the system that surrounds us. If you add the monsters location in time
(during and after the Industrial Revolution), it is clear what is being discussed when
most people say "technology." They are politically mystifying a much bigger
monster: capitalism in its advanced, industrial phase. Some years ago I read a
technophilic book in which the author speculated delightedly about how many sex organs
human beings might acquire via surgery. He was even "daring" enough (his own
word) to propose that men be given female organs and women male organs. The male friend of
mine who had recommended the book (another technophile) thought this an excellent idea. In
this way, men and women would understand each other better, he said. Now it is clear to me
that mens and womens misunderstandings, far from being due to the differences
in their sexual organs or their experiences in sexual intercourse per se, are carefully
cultivated in the service of sex-caste positions in a very nasty hierarchy. One cannot
dissolve the hierarchy by giving people double or triple sexual equipment. Tinkering with
the genitalia when the social structure is the problem is like the common
science-fictional device of "solving" the quality of life by giving people
immortality. The technology-obsessed--including those who read, write, and study SF--must
study economics and political analysis.
Raymond Williams
Utopia and Science Fiction
Abstract..-- There are many connections between science fiction and
utopian fiction, yet neither is a simple mode, and the relationships between them are
complex. If we analyze the fictions that have been grouped as utopian we can distinguish
four types: a) the paradise, in which a happier life is described as simply
existing elsewhere; b) the externally altered world, in which a new kind of life
has been made possible by an unlooked for natural event; c) the willed transformation,
in which a new kind of life has been achieved by human effort; and finally d) the
technological transformation, in which a new kind of life has been made possible by a
technical discovery. (Dystopian narratives may be discussed by inverting these terms, the
utopian paradise becoming dystopian hell, for instance.) Among the texts discussed in the
light of Engelss distinction between "utopian" and "scientific"
socialism are Bacons New Atlantis, Mores Utopia, Bellamys Looking
Backward, and Ursula K. Le Guins The Dispossessed.
Back to Home |