How To Apply
The Honor Scholar Program at DePauw University is interested in the life of the mind, specifically, the life of your mind. What intellectual pursuits do you engage in beyond the classroom? What issues keep you thinking long after class is over? What do you find yourself doing in the little spare time you have as a high school senior?
1) Apply to DePauw University
- You can apply to the Honor Scholar Program before receiving an admission decision from the University. If the Honors Program interests you, we recommend you apply now. You will receive an admission decision from the University soon.
2) Draft your essay response
- Choose, think about, and respond to one of the prompts below in an essay of about 500 words. The word limit is a soft limit. Craft your best response, and don't feel constrained by essay length.
- Please double space your text and include your name and mailing address at the top of your essay.
- Once complete, save the essay as a Word or PDF file and title the document using the 'last name, first name' format (e.g., Einstein, Albert).
3) Finalize your essay, then click here to submit your application
- Applications received by February 1st, 2020 will receive fullest consideration, although we may continue to accept later applications on a case-by-case basis. Questions regarding the application process or timeline should be directed to Amy Welch at firstname.lastname@example.org.
Before You Begin Your Essay...
Like the Honor Scholar Program itself, our application essays address a variety of topics, and call on you to consider multiple perspectives. The topics may touch on sensitive issues; they may challenge you to think in ways to which you are not accustomed. We think that you will find the essays both challenging and rewarding to consider and write about. The Honor Scholar Program takes the essays seriously, and we worked hard to generate diverse and engaging questions.
The essay and the interview that may follow are the most important factors in admission for our program. The Honor Scholar Program does not simply look at your test scores and GPA. We believe that the intellectual curiosity and courage, engagement, and interest we want in our students manifest more clearly in writing and in personal conversations than in SAT or ACT scores. So, take the essay seriously and use this opportunity to show us what you can do!
Read all the prompts carefully, think about them, and then choose one for your essay. Remember—there are no right answers here—think of this challenge as an opportunity for you to explore interesting issues and build a case for your point of view.
|Prompt Option 1: Look at me|
What does this image say to you? You may take any approach or perspective you like in responding to the photograph. That is, you could tell a story based on the photo, look at it as a piece of art, or comment on the political or cultural meanings it might convey.
|Prompt Option 2: HEALTH, RESPONSIBILITY, AND COMMUNITY|
Public health scientist Thomas Oliver wrote in 2006:
“[p]ublic health commonly involves governmental action to produce outcomes— injury and disease prevention or health promotion—that individuals are unlikely or unable to produce by themselves...[a] political community stresses a shared bond among members: organized society safeguards the common goods of health, welfare, and security, while members subordinate themselves to the welfare of the community as a whole. Public health can be achieved only through collective action, not through individual endeavor.”
This perspective may be widely accepted in public health, but it “runs counter to a fundamental emphasis on property rights, economic individualism, and competition in American political culture” as Oliver observes.
Considering recent global health crises such as Ebola, Zika, obesity, and others that threaten us, what should the role of government or international organizations be in the regulation and promotion of individual and/or the public’s health?
Reference: Oliver, T. (2006). Annual Review of Public Health. 27, 195-233. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.25.101802.123126
|PROMPT OPTION 3: I contain Multitudes|
According to Islamic law, traditional Muslim values, and common understanding, alcohol is prohibited in Islam. Yet, in a recent book, Shahab Ahmed begins by juxtaposing the two thought pieces indented below: the first comes from Walt Whitman’s poem, “Song of Myself”; the second is an anecdote about Muslim cultural practice.
Read both and discuss what you think Ahmed is trying to communicate by bringing these insights together.
Do I contradict myself?
Very well, then, I contradict myself.
(I am large, I contain multitudes).
Some years ago, …I witnessed a revealing exchange between an eminent
European philosopher…and a Muslim scholar….The Muslim colleague was
indulging in a glass of wine. Evidently troubled by this, the distinguished don
eventually asked “Do you consider yourself a Muslim?” “Yes,” came the reply.
“How come, then, you are drinking wine?” The Muslim colleague smiled gently.
“My family have been Muslims for a thousand years,” he said, “during which time
we have always been drinking wine….You see, we are Muslim wine-drinkers.” The
questioner looked bewildered. "I don’t understand,” he said. “Yes, I know,” replied
his native informant, “but I do.”
Reference: Ahmed, S. (2015). What is Islam? Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
|prompt option 4: Our reproductive future|
“We need to start thinking about these questions. The future is coming. It may not be exactly the future I foresee, but, like it or not, it will certainly feature far more choices, for families and for societies, about making babies.”
So says Henry Greely, a biomedical ethicist and lawyer at Stanford University, discussing how revolutionary scientific developments may change human reproduction. These advances include induced stem cells derived from skin, enhanced genetic diagnosis, and techniques to permanently edit DNA sequences. The stem cell technology may allow eggs and sperm to be made from skin cells—a technique that has already led to reproduction in mice. This could allow infertile heterosexual couples and same-sex couples to have “their own” genetic children. As genetic screening becomes more comprehensive, faster, and less expensive, we will be able to identify more and more genetic issues in embryos, and new techniques like CRISPR may (will?)—at some point—allow us to directly modify the genes.
So we invite you to start thinking-- should we use this technology? If so, how? What are the benefits and costs? Should there be limits, and if so why? Who should decide?
References: http://www.vox.com/2016/9/16/12931962/future-sex-reproductive-technology-ethics-ivf, and Greely, H. (2016). The End of Sex and the Future of Human Reproduction. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.